I am here to voice my comment about what is going on with the babby bells and AT&T.
So It looks like we have a monply on our hands or is it? What am I talking about well back in the 80’s the fcc said that AT&T was to big making south western bell and bell south and the other babby bells. They said that to much countrol of the telephone companys was not good. So what are democrats and repluibans doing now. Why can they just go in their and say ok you can have the phone company back to they way it was but we need to put a few rules in place to make it fair for every one. Here are the rules that are implyed as taken from CNET’S NEWS.COM “The conditions of the merger proposed by AT&T and agreed to by the FCC included the sale of certain wireless airwaves in the 2.5 gigahertz band, a special $19.95 per month price tag for stand-alone basic high-speed Internet service and a promise for the next two years to adhere to specific Network neutrality rules.
One of the most important concessions is AT&T’s commitment to a basic set of principles that establish a practical implementation of Net neutrality. Specifically, it agreed “not to provide or to sell to Internet content, application, or service providers, including those affiliated with AT&T/BellSouth, any service that privileges, degrades or prioritizes any packet transmitted over AT&T/BellSouth’s wireline broadband Internet access service based on its source, ownership or destination”
So why do we need to mirge the telephones back together so we can easly track people on the phone and we can get cheep brodband access or is it because now we do not know what a monply is.
In This writers opinion I think this stinks I do not need cheep brodband severce that comes on the back of the feds and I do not need the feds invloved in making a monply eather. On the otherhand if our goverment wants to watch you and listen to you on the phone or over the internet now they can because they have created the network to do so
